{"resource_id":6158,"title":"台湾通史","format":"md","encoding":"utf-8","chapters":[{"id":"chapter-1","title":"臺灣通史","sections":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","title":"林序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","title":"徐序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-3","title":"章序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-4","title":"徐序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-5","title":"張序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-6","title":"凡例","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-7","title":"卷一","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-8","title":"卷二","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-9","title":"卷三","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-10","title":"卷四","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-11","title":"卷五","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-12","title":"卷六","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-13","title":"卷七","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-14","title":"卷八","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-15","title":"卷九","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-16","title":"卷十","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-17","title":"卷十一","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-18","title":"卷十二","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-19","title":"卷十三","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-20","title":"卷十四","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-21","title":"卷十五","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-22","title":"卷十六","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-23","title":"卷十七","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-24","title":"卷十八","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-25","title":"卷十九","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-26","title":"卷二十","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-27","title":"卷二十一","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-28","title":"卷二十二","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-29","title":"卷二十三","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-30","title":"卷二十四","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-31","title":"卷二十五","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-32","title":"卷二十六","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-33","title":"卷二十七","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-34","title":"卷二十八","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-35","title":"卷二十九","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-36","title":"卷三十","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-37","title":"卷三十一","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-38","title":"卷三十二","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-39","title":"卷三十三","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-40","title":"卷三十四","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-41","title":"卷三十五","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-42","title":"卷三十六","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-43","title":"後序","paragraphs":["附表目","連雅堂先生家傳","連雅堂先生年表"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-44","title":"林序","paragraphs":["臺灣背歸墟而面齊州，豈即列子之所謂「岱輿、員嶠」耶？志言臺灣之名不一，或曰「大宛」，或曰「臺員」；審其音，蓋合「岱輿、員嶠」二者之名而一之爾。其地自鄭氏建國以前，實為太古民族所踞，不耕而飽，不織而溫，以花開草長驗歲時，以日入月出辨晝夜，巖居谷飲，禽視獸息，無人事之煩，而有生理之樂。斯非古之所謂仙者歟？抑亦因生齒未繁，乃得以坐享天地自然之利爾！","聞之故老言，吾族適此之先，嘗傭耕於諸番，為之誅荊榛、立阡陌，終歲勤動，不遑寧處，所贏者即節衣縮食之餘也。彼坐收十五之稅，而常苦不足，終且貨其產於我；則我勞而彼逸，我儉而彼奢也。故觀夫草衣木食之時，天之福諸番不可謂不厚矣。使其閉關自守，無競於人，雖至今嘯傲滄洲可也。一旦他人入室，乘瑕蹈隙，月進而歲不同；乃彼昏不知，猶懵焉無改。夫因陋就簡之習，則其得於天而失於人也固宜。","抑又聞之，吾先民之墾草此土也，其塟於蛇豕之腹、埋於榛莽之墟者，不知凡幾，故又呼之曰「埋冤」。然卒底於成者，則前仆後繼、慘淡經營之力也。訖於今，休養生息數百年，取益多而用益宏，食者眾而生者寡。雖然，微大力者負之而走，吾知喬木先疇猶將易主，而況巧拙相懸、強弱異勢乎？彼深山窮谷中雕題鑿齒之遺，固巳竊笑於旁而議其後矣。世之讀此書者，其亦念篳路藍縷之勤，而憮然於城郭人民之變也哉。","丙辰夏五，東寧林資修序於霧峰之麓。"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-45","title":"徐序","paragraphs":["左丘明作春秋傳，以三十卷括二百四十年之事，於會升賢之。司馬遷作史記，敘三千年事，僅五十萬言，班固作漢書，敘二百四十年事，至八十萬言。其煩省之異若是。張世偉乃謂班不如馬；劉知幾則言古今不同，勢使之然，不得斥近史為蕪累。然哉！然哉！今珂讀連君雅堂臺灣通史，見其煩省適中，而三複嘆美之者以此。通史者，通貫古今之史，與斷代史異，則尤易煩不易省者。雅堂為是，凡一千二百九十年之事，悉具於八十八篇，而乃鉅細畢舉，無漏無蔓。蓋為紀四、為志二十四、為傳六十，踵龍門之例而變通之，附表於志中，取便觀覽，為今之學者計也。其所紀載，始隋大業元年，終清光緒二十一年。臺灣文獻，於是不墜。","抑珂嘗聞之，知幾謂作史須兼才、學、識三長。雅堂才、學偉矣，其識乃尤偉。知民為邦本，非民則國曷以立，故於民生之豐嗇、民德之隆汙詳言之，視昔之修史從重兵、刑、禮、樂者何如耶？珂不敏，比亦粗有撰述，於民事輒致詳，猶雅堂之志也。既卒讀，爰書此以歸之。","中華民國十四年仲夏，杭縣徐珂謹書於上海。"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-46","title":"章序","paragraphs":["偉哉！鄭延平之啟臺灣也。以不毛之地、新造之國，而抗強胡百萬之眾，至於今遂為海中奧區焉。餘昔者聞其風烈，以為必有遺民舊德在也。直富有票舉兵，餘與其人多往復，為有司所牽，遯而至臺灣。臺灣隸日本已七年矣，猶以鄭氏舊事，不敢外視之。逾十年，漢土光復。又十四年，遺民連雅堂以所作臺灣通史見示。","臺灣故國也。其於中國，視朝鮮、安南為親。志其事者，不視以郡縣，而視以封建之國，故署曰通史，蓋華陽國志之例也。鄭氏多武功，政治闊略，清人得之，從事亦尚簡，故所言不能如華陽國志詳備。若其山川、邑落、物產、謠俗之變，則往往具矣，然非作者之志也。作者之志，蓋以為道土訓者必求其地建置之原。臺灣在明時，無過海中一浮島，日本、荷蘭更相奪攘，亦但羈縻不絕而已，未足雲建置也。自鄭氏受封，開府其地，孑遺士女，輻湊於赤嵌，銳師精甲環列而守，為恢復中原根本，然後屹然成巨鎮焉。鄭氏繫於明，明繫於中國，則臺灣者實中國所建置。其後屬清、屬日本，視之若等夷。臺灣無德於清，而漢族不可忘也。餘始至臺灣，求所謂遺民舊德者，千萬不可得一二。今觀雅堂之有作也，庶幾其人歟？","豪傑之士無文王而興者，鄭氏也。後之豪傑，今不可知。雖然，披荊棘、立城邑於三百年之上，使後世猶能興起而誦說之者，其烈蓋可忽乎哉？雅堂之書，亦於是為臺灣重也！","中華民國十六年一月，章炳麟。"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-47","title":"徐序","paragraphs":["中華民國三十四年，連雅堂先生所著之臺灣通史第一次在國內印行。六月，排版將畢，其哲嗣連定一先生命餘作敘。餘與定一先生十餘年故交，誼不敢辭，乃秉筆而言曰：","凡住居於此員輿上之民族，苟能不安僿野，黽勉前進，均必能在文化上有所貢獻，以傳遺後世，以沾溉人類。惟因時地不同，環境差殊，故每民族所創造之文化均必押有其環境之印記，於大同之文化體中有特異焉。此特異點與創造民族之盛衰分合有密切之關係，籀繹古史者不可不慎思而明辨之也。","我中華民族所創造之文化為世界巨大文化之一，殊無疑義。其特異點，依吾人之所探尋，蓋有三端：一曰緩，二曰久，三曰穩。自人類學者證明吾民族為中華之土著而外來之說絀，其奠居於斯土也已不知其綿歷幾萬年。從有傳說計起，炎、黃、羲、皞以後蓋已超過五千年。其同時之文化民族，若埃及人、若兩河間人，其進入歷史皆比中國較早。埃及之第十二朝（公元前二十與十九兩世紀）與將來第十八朝之阿門諾斐斯四世時（公元前十四世紀），其聲名文物蓋已燦然大備。巴庇倫之哈莫拉比王（公元前二十二世紀末），文治武功烜赫當時；其詳備法典所刻之原石尚在，為歷史家之異珍。希臘民族脫遊牧而進農事已當我商代後期，其傳說歷史晚於我國者一、兩千年；然其文化突飛猛進，至我國春秋、戰國之交，已足冠冕群倫。我國炎帝族之肇始農業，當在距今四千年之前。然夏、商古史，猶復唵昧；周代蹶起，文化始漸可與哈莫拉比時相比；及孔、老、墨諸子勃興，而哲學思想始得與後進之希臘諸賢哲並駕。經歷奕世，始躋於高度文化之林，則其緩也。埃及及兩河間之古代文化，至公元前二、三世紀已完全泯滅。希臘高尚文化，至後六世紀茹斯底年大帝封閉雅典學校後亦薪盡火絕。而中國之文化獨迢遰四、五千祀，未嘗中絕。自秦始皇至今二千餘年，史事之載於正史者無一年之缺逸，尤為世界各國之"]}]}],"toc":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"林序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"徐序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-3","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"章序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-4","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"徐序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-5","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"張序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-6","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"凡例","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-7","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-8","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-9","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-10","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-11","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-12","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-13","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷七","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-14","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷八","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-15","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷九","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-16","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-17","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-18","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-19","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-20","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-21","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-22","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-23","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十七","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-24","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十八","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-25","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷十九","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-26","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-27","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-28","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-29","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-30","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-31","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-32","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-33","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十七","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-34","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十八","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-35","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷二十九","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-36","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-37","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-38","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-39","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-40","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-41","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-42","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"卷三十六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-43","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"後序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-44","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"林序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-45","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"徐序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-46","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"章序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-47","chapter_title":"臺灣通史","section_title":"徐序","is_available":true}],"plain_text":"# 臺灣通史\n## 林序\n## 徐序\n## 章序\n## 徐序\n## 張序\n## 凡例\n## 卷一\n## 卷二\n## 卷三\n## 卷四\n## 卷五\n## 卷六\n## 卷七\n## 卷八\n## 卷九\n## 卷十\n## 卷十一\n## 卷十二\n## 卷十三\n## 卷十四\n## 卷十五\n## 卷十六\n## 卷十七\n## 卷十八\n## 卷十九\n## 卷二十\n## 卷二十一\n## 卷二十二\n## 卷二十三\n## 卷二十四\n## 卷二十五\n## 卷二十六\n## 卷二十七\n## 卷二十八\n## 卷二十九\n## 卷三十\n## 卷三十一\n## 卷三十二\n## 卷三十三\n## 卷三十四\n## 卷三十五\n## 卷三十六\n## 後序\n附表目\n連雅堂先生家傳\n連雅堂先生年表\n## 林序\n臺灣背歸墟而面齊州，豈即列子之所謂「岱輿、員嶠」耶？志言臺灣之名不一，或曰「大宛」，或曰「臺員」；審其音，蓋合「岱輿、員嶠」二者之名而一之爾。其地自鄭氏建國以前，實為太古民族所踞，不耕而飽，不織而溫，以花開草長驗歲時，以日入月出辨晝夜，巖居谷飲，禽視獸息，無人事之煩，而有生理之樂。斯非古之所謂仙者歟？抑亦因生齒未繁，乃得以坐享天地自然之利爾！\n聞之故老言，吾族適此之先，嘗傭耕於諸番，為之誅荊榛、立阡陌，終歲勤動，不遑寧處，所贏者即節衣縮食之餘也。彼坐收十五之稅，而常苦不足，終且貨其產於我；則我勞而彼逸，我儉而彼奢也。故觀夫草衣木食之時，天之福諸番不可謂不厚矣。使其閉關自守，無競於人，雖至今嘯傲滄洲可也。一旦他人入室，乘瑕蹈隙，月進而歲不同；乃彼昏不知，猶懵焉無改。夫因陋就簡之習，則其得於天而失於人也固宜。\n抑又聞之，吾先民之墾草此土也，其塟於蛇豕之腹、埋於榛莽之墟者，不知凡幾，故又呼之曰「埋冤」。然卒底於成者，則前仆後繼、慘淡經營之力也。訖於今，休養生息數百年，取益多而用益宏，食者眾而生者寡。雖然，微大力者負之而走，吾知喬木先疇猶將易主，而況巧拙相懸、強弱異勢乎？彼深山窮谷中雕題鑿齒之遺，固巳竊笑於旁而議其後矣。世之讀此書者，其亦念篳路藍縷之勤，而憮然於城郭人民之變也哉。\n丙辰夏五，東寧林資修序於霧峰之麓。\n## 徐序\n左丘明作春秋傳，以三十卷括二百四十年之事，於會升賢之。司馬遷作史記，敘三千年事，僅五十萬言，班固作漢書，敘二百四十年事，至八十萬言。其煩省之異若是。張世偉乃謂班不如馬；劉知幾則言古今不同，勢使之然，不得斥近史為蕪累。然哉！然哉！今珂讀連君雅堂臺灣通史，見其煩省適中，而三複嘆美之者以此。通史者，通貫古今之史，與斷代史異，則尤易煩不易省者。雅堂為是，凡一千二百九十年之事，悉具於八十八篇，而乃鉅細畢舉，無漏無蔓。蓋為紀四、為志二十四、為傳六十，踵龍門之例而變通之，附表於志中，取便觀覽，為今之學者計也。其所紀載，始隋大業元年，終清光緒二十一年。臺灣文獻，於是不墜。\n抑珂嘗聞之，知幾謂作史須兼才、學、識三長。雅堂才、學偉矣，其識乃尤偉。知民為邦本，非民則國曷以立，故於民生之豐嗇、民德之隆汙詳言之，視昔之修史從重兵、刑、禮、樂者何如耶？珂不敏，比亦粗有撰述，於民事輒致詳，猶雅堂之志也。既卒讀，爰書此以歸之。\n中華民國十四年仲夏，杭縣徐珂謹書於上海。\n## 章序\n偉哉！鄭延平之啟臺灣也。以不毛之地、新造之國，而抗強胡百萬之眾，至於今遂為海中奧區焉。餘昔者聞其風烈，以為必有遺民舊德在也。直富有票舉兵，餘與其人多往復，為有司所牽，遯而至臺灣。臺灣隸日本已七年矣，猶以鄭氏舊事，不敢外視之。逾十年，漢土光復。又十四年，遺民連雅堂以所作臺灣通史見示。\n臺灣故國也。其於中國，視朝鮮、安南為親。志其事者，不視以郡縣，而視以封建之國，故署曰通史，蓋華陽國志之例也。鄭氏多武功，政治闊略，清人得之，從事亦尚簡，故所言不能如華陽國志詳備。若其山川、邑落、物產、謠俗之變，則往往具矣，然非作者之志也。作者之志，蓋以為道土訓者必求其地建置之原。臺灣在明時，無過海中一浮島，日本、荷蘭更相奪攘，亦但羈縻不絕而已，未足雲建置也。自鄭氏受封，開府其地，孑遺士女，輻湊於赤嵌，銳師精甲環列而守，為恢復中原根本，然後屹然成巨鎮焉。鄭氏繫於明，明繫於中國，則臺灣者實中國所建置。其後屬清、屬日本，視之若等夷。臺灣無德於清，而漢族不可忘也。餘始至臺灣，求所謂遺民舊德者，千萬不可得一二。今觀雅堂之有作也，庶幾其人歟？\n豪傑之士無文王而興者，鄭氏也。後之豪傑，今不可知。雖然，披荊棘、立城邑於三百年之上，使後世猶能興起而誦說之者，其烈蓋可忽乎哉？雅堂之書，亦於是為臺灣重也！\n中華民國十六年一月，章炳麟。\n## 徐序\n中華民國三十四年，連雅堂先生所著之臺灣通史第一次在國內印行。六月，排版將畢，其哲嗣連定一先生命餘作敘。餘與定一先生十餘年故交，誼不敢辭，乃秉筆而言曰：\n凡住居於此員輿上之民族，苟能不安僿野，黽勉前進，均必能在文化上有所貢獻，以傳遺後世，以沾溉人類。惟因時地不同，環境差殊，故每民族所創造之文化均必押有其環境之印記，於大同之文化體中有特異焉。此特異點與創造民族之盛衰分合有密切之關係，籀繹古史者不可不慎思而明辨之也。\n我中華民族所創造之文化為世界巨大文化之一，殊無疑義。其特異點，依吾人之所探尋，蓋有三端：一曰緩，二曰久，三曰穩。自人類學者證明吾民族為中華之土著而外來之說絀，其奠居於斯土也已不知其綿歷幾萬年。從有傳說計起，炎、黃、羲、皞以後蓋已超過五千年。其同時之文化民族，若埃及人、若兩河間人，其進入歷史皆比中國較早。埃及之第十二朝（公元前二十與十九兩世紀）與將來第十八朝之阿門諾斐斯四世時（公元前十四世紀），其聲名文物蓋已燦然大備。巴庇倫之哈莫拉比王（公元前二十二世紀末），文治武功烜赫當時；其詳備法典所刻之原石尚在，為歷史家之異珍。希臘民族脫遊牧而進農事已當我商代後期，其傳說歷史晚於我國者一、兩千年；然其文化突飛猛進，至我國春秋、戰國之交，已足冠冕群倫。我國炎帝族之肇始農業，當在距今四千年之前。然夏、商古史，猶復唵昧；周代蹶起，文化始漸可與哈莫拉比時相比；及孔、老、墨諸子勃興，而哲學思想始得與後進之希臘諸賢哲並駕。經歷奕世，始躋於高度文化之林，則其緩也。埃及及兩河間之古代文化，至公元前二、三世紀已完全泯滅。希臘高尚文化，至後六世紀茹斯底年大帝封閉雅典學校後亦薪盡火絕。而中國之文化獨迢遰四、五千祀，未嘗中絕。自秦始皇至今二千餘年，史事之載於正史者無一年之缺逸，尤為世界各國之","is_preview":true,"preview_page_limit":10}