{"resource_id":6097,"title":"新唐书纠谬","format":"md","encoding":"utf-8","chapters":[{"id":"chapter-1","title":"四庫全書 新唐書糾謬　　（宋）吳縝 撰","sections":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","title":"欽定四庫全書","paragraphs":["史部一","新唐書糾謬","正史類"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","title":"提要","paragraphs":["（臣）等謹案新唐書糾謬二十卷宋呉縝撰鎮字廷珍成都人甞以朝散郎知蜀州後厯典數郡皆有惠政其著此書專以駁正新唐書之訛誤凡二十門四百餘事初名糾謬後改為辯證而紹興間長樂呉元美刊於湖州仍題為糾謬故至今沿其舊名王明清揮麈録稱歐陽修重修唐書時縝甞因範鎮請預官屬之末修以其年少輕佻拒之縝鞅鞅而去及新書成乃指摘瑕疵為此書晁公武甞引張九齡為相事謂其誤有詆訶今觀其書實不免有意掊擊如第二十門字書非是一條至厯指偏傍點畫之訛以譏切修等大都近於吹毛索瘢然歐宋之作新書歐主褒貶宋主文章而於故事考證頗疎牴牾蹖駁本自不少縝自序中所舉八失原亦深中其病不可謂無禆史學也今世所行刊本第二十卷栁宗元傳至蘇定方傳凡六條皆全脫而錯入第六卷郭潛曜姓不同以下四條之文重複舛誤已非完書獨兩淮所進本尚屬南宋舊槧其栁宗元傳六條原文具在謹據以訂正焉","乾隆四十三年六月恭校上","總纂官 （臣）紀昀 （臣）陸錫熊 （臣）孫士毅","總校官 （臣）陸費墀"]}]},{"id":"chapter-2","title":"新唐書糾謬目録","sections":[{"id":"chapter-2-section-1","title":"卷一","paragraphs":["一曰以無為有"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-2","title":"卷二","paragraphs":["二曰似實而虛"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-3","title":"卷三","paragraphs":["三曰書事失實"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-4","title":"卷四","paragraphs":["四曰自相違舛"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-5","title":"卷五","paragraphs":["五曰年月時世差互"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-6","title":"卷六","paragraphs":["六曰官爵姓名謬誤"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-7","title":"卷七","paragraphs":["七曰世系鄉里無法"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-8","title":"卷八","paragraphs":["八曰尊敬君親不嚴"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-9","title":"卷九","paragraphs":["九曰紀志表傳不相符合"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-10","title":"卷十","paragraphs":["十曰一事兩見而異同不完"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-11","title":"卷十一","paragraphs":["十一曰載述脫誤"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-12","title":"卷十二","paragraphs":["十二曰事狀叢復"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-13","title":"卷十三","paragraphs":["十三曰宜削而反存"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-14","title":"卷十四","paragraphs":["十四曰當書而反闕"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-15","title":"卷十五","paragraphs":["十五曰義例不明"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-16","title":"卷十六","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-17","title":"十六曰先後失序","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-18","title":"卷十七","paragraphs":["十七曰編次未當"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-19","title":"卷十八","paragraphs":["十八曰與奪不常"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-20","title":"卷十九","paragraphs":["十九曰事有可疑"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-21","title":"卷二十","paragraphs":["二十曰字書非是"]},{"id":"chapter-2-section-22","title":"●新唐書糾謬原序","paragraphs":["史才之難尚矣遊夏聖門之髙弟而不能贊春秋一辭自秦漢迄今千數百歳若司馬遷班固陳壽範蔚宗者方其著書之時豈不欲曲盡其善而傳之無窮然終亦未免後人之詆斥至唐獨稱劉知幾能於修史之外毅然奮筆自為一書貫穿古今譏評前載觀其以史自命之意殆以為古今絶倫及取其嘗所論著而考其謬戾則亦無異於前人由是言之史才之難豈不信哉必也編次事實詳畧取舎褒貶文采莫不適當稽諸前人而不謬傳之後世而無疑粲然如日星之明符節之合使後學觀之而莫敢輕議然後可以號信史反是則篇帙愈多而譏譙愈眾奈天下後世何我宋之興一祖五宗重熙累洽尊儒敬道儲思藝文日以崇廣學校修纂文史為事故名臣綴緝不絶於時前朝舊史如唐書洎五代實錄皆已修為新書頒於天下其間惟唐書自頒行迨今幾三十載學者傳習與遷固諸史均焉縝以愚昧從公之隙竊嘗尋閱新書間有未通則必反覆叅究或舛駁脫謬則筆而記之歳時稍久事目益眾深怪此書牴牾穿穴亦已太甚揆之前史皆未有如是者推本厥咎蓋修書之初其失有八一曰責任不專二曰課程不立三曰初無義例四曰終無審覆五曰多采小說而不精擇六曰務因舊文而不推考七曰刋修者不知刋修之要而各徇私好八曰校勘者不舉校勘之職而惟務茍容何謂責任不專夫古之修史多出一家故司馬遷班固姚思亷李延壽之徒皆父子論譔數十年方成故通知始末而事實貫穿不牴牾也惟後漢東觀群儒纂述無統而前史譏之況夫唐之為國幾三百年其記事亦已眾矣其為功亦已大矣斯可謂一朝之大典舉以委人而不專其責則宜其功之不立也今唐史本一書也而紀志表則歐陽公主之傳則宋公主之所主既異而不務通知其事故紀有失而傳不知【如膠東郡公道彥等紀書降封縣公而傳乃郡公之類】傳有誤而紀不見【如朱宣傳敘天平節度使止有四人而紀則有七人之類】豈非責任不專之故歟何謂課程不立夫修一朝之史其事匪輕若不限以歳月責其課程則未見其可嘗聞修唐書自建局至印行罷局幾二十年修書官初無定員皆兼蒞它務或出領外官其書既無期會得以安衍自肆茍度歳月如是者將十五年而書猶未有緒暨朝廷訝其淹久屢加督促往往遣使就官所取之於是乃倉猝牽課以書來上然則是書之不能完整又何足怪豈非課程不立之故歟何謂初無義例夫史之義例猶網之有綱而匠之繩墨也故唐修晉書而敬播令狐徳棻之徒先為定例蓋義例既定則一史之內凡秉筆者皆遵用之其取捨詳畧褒貶是非必使後人皆有考焉今之新書則不然取彼例以較此例則不同取前傳以比後傳則不合詳畧不一【如中宗紀前與諸帝紀不同諸帝紀亦自詳畧不同之類】去取未明【如皇太子改名並誕節名及上壽皆不書而上尊號則書之類】一史之內為體各殊豈非初無義例之故歟何謂終無審覆方新書來上之初若朝廷付之有司委官覆定使詰難糾駁審定刋修然後下朝臣博議可與未可施用如此則初修者必不敢滅裂審覆者亦不敢依違庶乎得為完書可以傳久今其書頒行已久而疎謬舛駁於今始見豈非終無審覆之故歟何謂多采小說而不精擇蓋唐人小說類多虛誕而修書之初但期博取故其所載或全篇乖牾【如代宗母吳皇后傳之類】豈非多采小說而不精擇之故歟何謂務因舊文而不推考夫唐之史臣書事任情者多矣【如吳兢書魏齊公事可以推知當日史臣書事與奪止在其筆端又如辛雲京自立而傳止稱其朝命李徳裕執政增修其父吉甫美事之類】安可悉依徇而書今之新書乃殊不叅較但循舊而已故其失與唐之史臣無異【如太宗放死囚三百九十人義陽宣城公主四十不嫁之類】豈非務因舊文而不推考之故歟何謂刋修者不知刋修之要而各徇私好夫為史之要有三一曰事實二曰褒貶三曰文采有是事而如是書斯謂事實因事實而寓懲勸斯謂褒貶事實褒貶既得矣必資文采以行之夫然後成史至於事得其實矣而褒貶文采則闕焉雖未能成書猶不失為史之意若乃事實未明而徒以褒貶文采為事則是既不成書而又失為史之意矣新書之病正在於此其始也不考其虛實有無不校其彼此同異修紀志者則專以褒貶筆削自任修傳者則獨以文辭華採為先不相通知各從所好其終也遂合為一書而上之故今之新書其間或舉以相校則往往不啻白黑方圓之不同是蓋不考事實不相通知之所致也斯豈非刋修者不知其要而各徇私好之故歟何謂校勘者不舉校勘之職而惟務茍容方新書之來上也朝廷付裴煜陳薦文同吳申錢藻使之校勘夫以三百年一朝之史而又修之幾二十年將以垂示萬世則朝廷之意豈徒然哉若校勘者止於執卷唱讀案文讎對則是二三胥吏足辦其事何假文館之士乎然則朝廷委屬之意重矣受其書而校勘者安可不思必也討論擊難刋削繕完使成一家之書乃稱校勘之職而五人者曾不聞有所建明但循故襲常惟務喑嘿致其間訛文謬事歴歴具存自是之後遂頒之天下矣豈非校勘者不舉其職而惟務茍容之故歟職是八失故新書不能"]}]}],"toc":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","chapter_title":"四庫全書 新唐書糾謬　　（宋）吳縝 撰","section_title":"欽定四庫全書","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","chapter_title":"四庫全書 新唐書糾謬　　（宋）吳縝 撰","section_title":"提要","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-1","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-2","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-3","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-4","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-5","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-6","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-7","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷七","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-8","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷八","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-9","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷九","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-10","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-11","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十一","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-12","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十二","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-13","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十三","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-14","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十四","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-15","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十五","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-16","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十六","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-17","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"十六曰先後失序","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-18","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十七","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-19","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十八","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-20","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷十九","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-21","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"卷二十","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-2-section-22","chapter_title":"新唐書糾謬目録","section_title":"●新唐書糾謬原序","is_available":true}],"plain_text":"# 四庫全書 新唐書糾謬　　（宋）吳縝 撰\n## 欽定四庫全書\n史部一\n新唐書糾謬\n正史類\n## 提要\n（臣）等謹案新唐書糾謬二十卷宋呉縝撰鎮字廷珍成都人甞以朝散郎知蜀州後厯典數郡皆有惠政其著此書專以駁正新唐書之訛誤凡二十門四百餘事初名糾謬後改為辯證而紹興間長樂呉元美刊於湖州仍題為糾謬故至今沿其舊名王明清揮麈録稱歐陽修重修唐書時縝甞因範鎮請預官屬之末修以其年少輕佻拒之縝鞅鞅而去及新書成乃指摘瑕疵為此書晁公武甞引張九齡為相事謂其誤有詆訶今觀其書實不免有意掊擊如第二十門字書非是一條至厯指偏傍點畫之訛以譏切修等大都近於吹毛索瘢然歐宋之作新書歐主褒貶宋主文章而於故事考證頗疎牴牾蹖駁本自不少縝自序中所舉八失原亦深中其病不可謂無禆史學也今世所行刊本第二十卷栁宗元傳至蘇定方傳凡六條皆全脫而錯入第六卷郭潛曜姓不同以下四條之文重複舛誤已非完書獨兩淮所進本尚屬南宋舊槧其栁宗元傳六條原文具在謹據以訂正焉\n乾隆四十三年六月恭校上\n總纂官 （臣）紀昀 （臣）陸錫熊 （臣）孫士毅\n總校官 （臣）陸費墀\n# 新唐書糾謬目録\n## 卷一\n一曰以無為有\n## 卷二\n二曰似實而虛\n## 卷三\n三曰書事失實\n## 卷四\n四曰自相違舛\n## 卷五\n五曰年月時世差互\n## 卷六\n六曰官爵姓名謬誤\n## 卷七\n七曰世系鄉里無法\n## 卷八\n八曰尊敬君親不嚴\n## 卷九\n九曰紀志表傳不相符合\n## 卷十\n十曰一事兩見而異同不完\n## 卷十一\n十一曰載述脫誤\n## 卷十二\n十二曰事狀叢復\n## 卷十三\n十三曰宜削而反存\n## 卷十四\n十四曰當書而反闕\n## 卷十五\n十五曰義例不明\n## 卷十六\n## 十六曰先後失序\n## 卷十七\n十七曰編次未當\n## 卷十八\n十八曰與奪不常\n## 卷十九\n十九曰事有可疑\n## 卷二十\n二十曰字書非是\n## ●新唐書糾謬原序\n史才之難尚矣遊夏聖門之髙弟而不能贊春秋一辭自秦漢迄今千數百歳若司馬遷班固陳壽範蔚宗者方其著書之時豈不欲曲盡其善而傳之無窮然終亦未免後人之詆斥至唐獨稱劉知幾能於修史之外毅然奮筆自為一書貫穿古今譏評前載觀其以史自命之意殆以為古今絶倫及取其嘗所論著而考其謬戾則亦無異於前人由是言之史才之難豈不信哉必也編次事實詳畧取舎褒貶文采莫不適當稽諸前人而不謬傳之後世而無疑粲然如日星之明符節之合使後學觀之而莫敢輕議然後可以號信史反是則篇帙愈多而譏譙愈眾奈天下後世何我宋之興一祖五宗重熙累洽尊儒敬道儲思藝文日以崇廣學校修纂文史為事故名臣綴緝不絶於時前朝舊史如唐書洎五代實錄皆已修為新書頒於天下其間惟唐書自頒行迨今幾三十載學者傳習與遷固諸史均焉縝以愚昧從公之隙竊嘗尋閱新書間有未通則必反覆叅究或舛駁脫謬則筆而記之歳時稍久事目益眾深怪此書牴牾穿穴亦已太甚揆之前史皆未有如是者推本厥咎蓋修書之初其失有八一曰責任不專二曰課程不立三曰初無義例四曰終無審覆五曰多采小說而不精擇六曰務因舊文而不推考七曰刋修者不知刋修之要而各徇私好八曰校勘者不舉校勘之職而惟務茍容何謂責任不專夫古之修史多出一家故司馬遷班固姚思亷李延壽之徒皆父子論譔數十年方成故通知始末而事實貫穿不牴牾也惟後漢東觀群儒纂述無統而前史譏之況夫唐之為國幾三百年其記事亦已眾矣其為功亦已大矣斯可謂一朝之大典舉以委人而不專其責則宜其功之不立也今唐史本一書也而紀志表則歐陽公主之傳則宋公主之所主既異而不務通知其事故紀有失而傳不知【如膠東郡公道彥等紀書降封縣公而傳乃郡公之類】傳有誤而紀不見【如朱宣傳敘天平節度使止有四人而紀則有七人之類】豈非責任不專之故歟何謂課程不立夫修一朝之史其事匪輕若不限以歳月責其課程則未見其可嘗聞修唐書自建局至印行罷局幾二十年修書官初無定員皆兼蒞它務或出領外官其書既無期會得以安衍自肆茍度歳月如是者將十五年而書猶未有緒暨朝廷訝其淹久屢加督促往往遣使就官所取之於是乃倉猝牽課以書來上然則是書之不能完整又何足怪豈非課程不立之故歟何謂初無義例夫史之義例猶網之有綱而匠之繩墨也故唐修晉書而敬播令狐徳棻之徒先為定例蓋義例既定則一史之內凡秉筆者皆遵用之其取捨詳畧褒貶是非必使後人皆有考焉今之新書則不然取彼例以較此例則不同取前傳以比後傳則不合詳畧不一【如中宗紀前與諸帝紀不同諸帝紀亦自詳畧不同之類】去取未明【如皇太子改名並誕節名及上壽皆不書而上尊號則書之類】一史之內為體各殊豈非初無義例之故歟何謂終無審覆方新書來上之初若朝廷付之有司委官覆定使詰難糾駁審定刋修然後下朝臣博議可與未可施用如此則初修者必不敢滅裂審覆者亦不敢依違庶乎得為完書可以傳久今其書頒行已久而疎謬舛駁於今始見豈非終無審覆之故歟何謂多采小說而不精擇蓋唐人小說類多虛誕而修書之初但期博取故其所載或全篇乖牾【如代宗母吳皇后傳之類】豈非多采小說而不精擇之故歟何謂務因舊文而不推考夫唐之史臣書事任情者多矣【如吳兢書魏齊公事可以推知當日史臣書事與奪止在其筆端又如辛雲京自立而傳止稱其朝命李徳裕執政增修其父吉甫美事之類】安可悉依徇而書今之新書乃殊不叅較但循舊而已故其失與唐之史臣無異【如太宗放死囚三百九十人義陽宣城公主四十不嫁之類】豈非務因舊文而不推考之故歟何謂刋修者不知刋修之要而各徇私好夫為史之要有三一曰事實二曰褒貶三曰文采有是事而如是書斯謂事實因事實而寓懲勸斯謂褒貶事實褒貶既得矣必資文采以行之夫然後成史至於事得其實矣而褒貶文采則闕焉雖未能成書猶不失為史之意若乃事實未明而徒以褒貶文采為事則是既不成書而又失為史之意矣新書之病正在於此其始也不考其虛實有無不校其彼此同異修紀志者則專以褒貶筆削自任修傳者則獨以文辭華採為先不相通知各從所好其終也遂合為一書而上之故今之新書其間或舉以相校則往往不啻白黑方圓之不同是蓋不考事實不相通知之所致也斯豈非刋修者不知其要而各徇私好之故歟何謂校勘者不舉校勘之職而惟務茍容方新書之來上也朝廷付裴煜陳薦文同吳申錢藻使之校勘夫以三百年一朝之史而又修之幾二十年將以垂示萬世則朝廷之意豈徒然哉若校勘者止於執卷唱讀案文讎對則是二三胥吏足辦其事何假文館之士乎然則朝廷委屬之意重矣受其書而校勘者安可不思必也討論擊難刋削繕完使成一家之書乃稱校勘之職而五人者曾不聞有所建明但循故襲常惟務喑嘿致其間訛文謬事歴歴具存自是之後遂頒之天下矣豈非校勘者不舉其職而惟務茍容之故歟職是八失故新書不能","is_preview":true,"preview_page_limit":10}