{"resource_id":5777,"title":"古今图书集成20","format":"md","encoding":"utf-8","chapters":[{"id":"chapter-1","title":"古今圖書整合20","sections":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","title":"正文","paragraphs":["嫌疑部總論","嫌疑不獨交誼中有之然交際","之間防範為要故立部於茲典中","禮記","曲禮","夫禮者所以決嫌疑","疏","決嫌疑者若妾為女君期女君為妾若服之則","太重降之則有舅姑為婦之嫌故全不服是決嫌","也孔子之喪門人疑所服子貢引夫子喪顏淵若","喪子而無服喪子路亦然請喪夫子若喪父而無","服是決疑也","集","說","藍田呂氏曰嫂叔不通問嫂叔無","服君沐粱大夫沐稷士沐粱燕不以公卿為賓以I","大夫為賓此所以決嫌疑也　馬氏曰宗廟之儀","迎牲而不迎屍燕之禮宰夫為獻主而以大夫為","賓所以斷君臣之疑男女非有行媒不相知名非","受幣不交不親所以別男女之嫌凡為此者所以","決嫌疑也　費氏曰事不能無嫌疑理之自然也","聖人制禮以決之而人處嫌疑之際無不得其當","如男女不親授受嫂叔不通問之類是也　長樂","陳氏曰易曰陰疑於陽又曰為其嫌於無陽燕義","曰不以公卿為賓為疑也明嫌之義也蓋兩物相","似為疑以此兼彼為嫌","離坐離立毋往參焉離立者不出中間","疏","此一節明不幹人私並遠嫌之法若見彼或二","人並坐或並立恐密有所論則己不得輒往參預","也二人並立當己行路則避之不得當其中間出","也","男女不雜坐不同椸枷不同巾櫛不親授嫂叔不通","問諸母不漱裳外言不入於捆內言不出於捆女子","許嫁纓非有大故不入其門姑姊妹女子子已嫁而","反兄弟弗與同席而坐弗與同器而食","注","皆為重別防淫亂不雜坐謂男子在堂女子在","房也椸可以枷衣者通問謂相稱謝也諸母庶母","也漱澣也庶母賤可使漱衣不可使漱裳裳賤尊","之者亦所以遠別外言內言男女之職也不出入","者不以相問也捆門限也女子許嫁系纓有從人","之端也大故宮中有災變若疾病乃後入也女子","有宮者亦謂由命士以上也春秋傳曰群公子之","舍則已卑矣女子十年而不出嫁及成人可以出","矣猶不與男子共席而坐亦遠別也","疏","自此至弗","與為友總明遠嫌之法不親授者男女有物不親","相授也諸母謂父之諸妾有子者外言內言謂男","職在官政女職在織各有限域不得濫預女子","婦人通稱也婦人質弱不能自固必有系屬故恆","系纓纓有二時一是少時常佩香纓內則雲男女","未冠笄紟纓是也一是許嫁時系纓婚禮主人入","親說婦纓鄭注婦人十五許嫁笄而禮之因著纓","是也蓋以五采為之其制未聞又內則曰婦事舅","姑紟纓以此而言故知有二纓也大故謂喪病之","屬也女子已許嫁則有宮門列為成人唯有喪病","等乃可入其門女子子者謂已嫁女子男子則單","稱子女子則重言子鄭注喪服雲是別於男子故","雲女子子女雖已嫁及成人猶宜別席鄭引公羊","傳見莊元年證女子有別宮也熊氏雲鄭謂男子","在堂女子在房若大宗收族宗子燕食族人於堂","宗子之婦燕食族婦於房也兄弟弗與同席同器","未嫁亦然","集","說","長樂劉氏曰家人內政不嚴以防之","於細微之初不剛以正之於未然之始則其悔咎","不可逭矣易曰閒有家志未變也男女之志既為","情邪之所變閒禁雖嚴求其無咎而咎可無哉故","夫婦未七十雖同藏未有可嫌也聖人制禮必爾","者以無嫌正有嫌也用有情之難正無情之易也","而況於男女未有室家者哉女子許嫁纓所以系","屬其心以著誠於夫氏起其孝義也既許嫁則有","姆教之處於閫內之別室男子非有疾憂之故不","入其門也　長樂陳氏曰禮始於謹夫婦為宮室","辨內外故七年男女不同席不共食則長可知矣","道路男子由左婦人由右則閨門可知矣然同藏","唯七十可也親授唯喪祭可也通問唯援溺可也","男正位乎外女正位乎內此內外之辨也然內言","不出而有所謂出外言不入而有所謂入周官內","小臣達王后之好事於四方則內言出於捆矣內","宰以陰禮教六宮則外言入於捆矣蓋先王制禮","為嫌疑無別而已嫌疑有以別雖內言之出外言","之入可也","父子不同席男女非有行媒不相知名非受幣不交","不親故日月以告君齋戒以告鬼神為酒食以召鄉","黨僚友以厚其別也取妻不取同姓故買妾不知其","姓則卜之寡婦之子非有見焉弗與為友","注","父子不同席異尊卑也男女有媒往來傳婚姻","之言乃相知姓名有禮乃相纏固故必受幣周禮","凡取判妻入子者媒氏書之以告君謂日月以告","君也婚禮凡受女之禮皆於廟為神席以告鬼神","謂齋戒以告鬼神為酒食會賓客厚重慎也不取","同姓為其近禽獸也妾賤或時非媵取之於賤者","世無本系故卜之寡婦之子弗友闢嫌也有見謂","有奇才卓然眾人所知","集","說","馬氏曰坐則異席居不","同宮者著父子之位也禮者以為民坊也非行媒","不相知名所以遠嫌也非受幣不交不親所以致","敬也遠嫌致敬則安有桑中之奔溱洧之亂乎明","而尊者莫如君書日月以詔之幽而嚴者莫如鬼","神致齋戒以告之近而親者莫如鄉黨僚友為飲","食以命之所以備禮而厚其別也　金華邵氏曰","上言兄弟不同席而坐所以遠嫌此言父子不同","席所以嚴分言雖同而意則異也夫婦之合在謹","其始始之不謹則其合易離有行媒而後知名受","幣而後交親庶乎行之以禮矣然必日月告君以","示不失時齋戒告鬼神以示不敢專召鄉黨僚友","以示同其慶如是而後男女之別厚取妻不取同","姓買妾必卜其姓又所以重宗也人之同姓其始","皆一宗耳其後譜系派別支族分散遂以為非親","苟自其宗而推之安知其不與吾為姊妹也與吾","為侄娣也豈不害教乎","僕御婦人則進左手後右手","注","進左後右遠嫌也","疏","僕在中央婦人在左僕御","之時進左手持轡使形微相背若進右手則近相","向故後右手以遠嫌也","禮運","禮者君之大柄也所以別嫌明微","集","說","長樂劉氏曰尊卑嫌者則以貴賤別之長少嫌","者則以親疏別之先後嫌者則以上下別之則人","倫之類可齊而五品之嫌疑判矣","坊記","子云夫禮者所以章疑別微以為民坊者也故貴賤","有等衣服有別朝廷有位則民有所讓子云天無二","日土無二王家無二主尊無二上示民有君臣之別","也春秋不稱楚越之王喪禮君不稱天大夫不稱君","恐民之惑也詩云相彼盍旦尚猶患之子云君不與","同姓同車與異姓同車不同服示民不嫌也以此坊","民民猶得同姓以弒其君","注","朝廷之位謂朝位也楚越之君僭號稱王不稱","其喪謂不書葬也春秋傳曰吳楚之君不書葬闢","其僭號也臣者天君稱天子為天王諸侯不言天","公闢王也大夫有臣者稱之曰主不言君闢諸侯","也此言皆為使民疑惑不知孰者尊也周禮曰主","友之讎視從父昆弟盍旦夜鳴求旦之鳥也求不","可得也人猶惡其欲反晝夜而亂晦明況於臣之","僭君求不可得之類亂上下惑眾也同姓者謂先","王先公子孫有繼及之道者也其非此則無嫌也","僕右恆朝服君則各以時事唯在軍同服爾","疏","自","此至犯君一節明章疑別嫌恐尊卑相僭使人疑","惑之事疑謂是非不決禮以章明之微謂幽隱不","著禮以分別之楚越書葬則當稱葬某王闢王之","名故不書葬盍旦欲反夜而為旦猶臣之奢僭欲","反而為上也此逸詩僕及車右身衣朝服故曲禮","雲乘路馬必朝服是也其朝服之內則有虎裘狼","裘故玉藻雲君之右虎裘厥左狼裘是也僖五年","左傳雲均服振振取虢之"]}]}],"toc":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","chapter_title":"古今圖書整合20","section_title":"正文","is_available":true}],"plain_text":"# 古今圖書整合20\n嫌疑部總論\n嫌疑不獨交誼中有之然交際\n之間防範為要故立部於茲典中\n禮記\n曲禮\n夫禮者所以決嫌疑\n疏\n決嫌疑者若妾為女君期女君為妾若服之則\n太重降之則有舅姑為婦之嫌故全不服是決嫌\n也孔子之喪門人疑所服子貢引夫子喪顏淵若\n喪子而無服喪子路亦然請喪夫子若喪父而無\n服是決疑也\n集\n說\n藍田呂氏曰嫂叔不通問嫂叔無\n服君沐粱大夫沐稷士沐粱燕不以公卿為賓以I\n大夫為賓此所以決嫌疑也　馬氏曰宗廟之儀\n迎牲而不迎屍燕之禮宰夫為獻主而以大夫為\n賓所以斷君臣之疑男女非有行媒不相知名非\n受幣不交不親所以別男女之嫌凡為此者所以\n決嫌疑也　費氏曰事不能無嫌疑理之自然也\n聖人制禮以決之而人處嫌疑之際無不得其當\n如男女不親授受嫂叔不通問之類是也　長樂\n陳氏曰易曰陰疑於陽又曰為其嫌於無陽燕義\n曰不以公卿為賓為疑也明嫌之義也蓋兩物相\n似為疑以此兼彼為嫌\n離坐離立毋往參焉離立者不出中間\n疏\n此一節明不幹人私並遠嫌之法若見彼或二\n人並坐或並立恐密有所論則己不得輒往參預\n也二人並立當己行路則避之不得當其中間出\n也\n男女不雜坐不同椸枷不同巾櫛不親授嫂叔不通\n問諸母不漱裳外言不入於捆內言不出於捆女子\n許嫁纓非有大故不入其門姑姊妹女子子已嫁而\n反兄弟弗與同席而坐弗與同器而食\n注\n皆為重別防淫亂不雜坐謂男子在堂女子在\n房也椸可以枷衣者通問謂相稱謝也諸母庶母\n也漱澣也庶母賤可使漱衣不可使漱裳裳賤尊\n之者亦所以遠別外言內言男女之職也不出入\n者不以相問也捆門限也女子許嫁系纓有從人\n之端也大故宮中有災變若疾病乃後入也女子\n有宮者亦謂由命士以上也春秋傳曰群公子之\n舍則已卑矣女子十年而不出嫁及成人可以出\n矣猶不與男子共席而坐亦遠別也\n疏\n自此至弗\n與為友總明遠嫌之法不親授者男女有物不親\n相授也諸母謂父之諸妾有子者外言內言謂男\n職在官政女職在織各有限域不得濫預女子\n婦人通稱也婦人質弱不能自固必有系屬故恆\n系纓纓有二時一是少時常佩香纓內則雲男女\n未冠笄紟纓是也一是許嫁時系纓婚禮主人入\n親說婦纓鄭注婦人十五許嫁笄而禮之因著纓\n是也蓋以五采為之其制未聞又內則曰婦事舅\n姑紟纓以此而言故知有二纓也大故謂喪病之\n屬也女子已許嫁則有宮門列為成人唯有喪病\n等乃可入其門女子子者謂已嫁女子男子則單\n稱子女子則重言子鄭注喪服雲是別於男子故\n雲女子子女雖已嫁及成人猶宜別席鄭引公羊\n傳見莊元年證女子有別宮也熊氏雲鄭謂男子\n在堂女子在房若大宗收族宗子燕食族人於堂\n宗子之婦燕食族婦於房也兄弟弗與同席同器\n未嫁亦然\n集\n說\n長樂劉氏曰家人內政不嚴以防之\n於細微之初不剛以正之於未然之始則其悔咎\n不可逭矣易曰閒有家志未變也男女之志既為\n情邪之所變閒禁雖嚴求其無咎而咎可無哉故\n夫婦未七十雖同藏未有可嫌也聖人制禮必爾\n者以無嫌正有嫌也用有情之難正無情之易也\n而況於男女未有室家者哉女子許嫁纓所以系\n屬其心以著誠於夫氏起其孝義也既許嫁則有\n姆教之處於閫內之別室男子非有疾憂之故不\n入其門也　長樂陳氏曰禮始於謹夫婦為宮室\n辨內外故七年男女不同席不共食則長可知矣\n道路男子由左婦人由右則閨門可知矣然同藏\n唯七十可也親授唯喪祭可也通問唯援溺可也\n男正位乎外女正位乎內此內外之辨也然內言\n不出而有所謂出外言不入而有所謂入周官內\n小臣達王后之好事於四方則內言出於捆矣內\n宰以陰禮教六宮則外言入於捆矣蓋先王制禮\n為嫌疑無別而已嫌疑有以別雖內言之出外言\n之入可也\n父子不同席男女非有行媒不相知名非受幣不交\n不親故日月以告君齋戒以告鬼神為酒食以召鄉\n黨僚友以厚其別也取妻不取同姓故買妾不知其\n姓則卜之寡婦之子非有見焉弗與為友\n注\n父子不同席異尊卑也男女有媒往來傳婚姻\n之言乃相知姓名有禮乃相纏固故必受幣周禮\n凡取判妻入子者媒氏書之以告君謂日月以告\n君也婚禮凡受女之禮皆於廟為神席以告鬼神\n謂齋戒以告鬼神為酒食會賓客厚重慎也不取\n同姓為其近禽獸也妾賤或時非媵取之於賤者\n世無本系故卜之寡婦之子弗友闢嫌也有見謂\n有奇才卓然眾人所知\n集\n說\n馬氏曰坐則異席居不\n同宮者著父子之位也禮者以為民坊也非行媒\n不相知名所以遠嫌也非受幣不交不親所以致\n敬也遠嫌致敬則安有桑中之奔溱洧之亂乎明\n而尊者莫如君書日月以詔之幽而嚴者莫如鬼\n神致齋戒以告之近而親者莫如鄉黨僚友為飲\n食以命之所以備禮而厚其別也　金華邵氏曰\n上言兄弟不同席而坐所以遠嫌此言父子不同\n席所以嚴分言雖同而意則異也夫婦之合在謹\n其始始之不謹則其合易離有行媒而後知名受\n幣而後交親庶乎行之以禮矣然必日月告君以\n示不失時齋戒告鬼神以示不敢專召鄉黨僚友\n以示同其慶如是而後男女之別厚取妻不取同\n姓買妾必卜其姓又所以重宗也人之同姓其始\n皆一宗耳其後譜系派別支族分散遂以為非親\n苟自其宗而推之安知其不與吾為姊妹也與吾\n為侄娣也豈不害教乎\n僕御婦人則進左手後右手\n注\n進左後右遠嫌也\n疏\n僕在中央婦人在左僕御\n之時進左手持轡使形微相背若進右手則近相\n向故後右手以遠嫌也\n禮運\n禮者君之大柄也所以別嫌明微\n集\n說\n長樂劉氏曰尊卑嫌者則以貴賤別之長少嫌\n者則以親疏別之先後嫌者則以上下別之則人\n倫之類可齊而五品之嫌疑判矣\n坊記\n子云夫禮者所以章疑別微以為民坊者也故貴賤\n有等衣服有別朝廷有位則民有所讓子云天無二\n日土無二王家無二主尊無二上示民有君臣之別\n也春秋不稱楚越之王喪禮君不稱天大夫不稱君\n恐民之惑也詩云相彼盍旦尚猶患之子云君不與\n同姓同車與異姓同車不同服示民不嫌也以此坊\n民民猶得同姓以弒其君\n注\n朝廷之位謂朝位也楚越之君僭號稱王不稱\n其喪謂不書葬也春秋傳曰吳楚之君不書葬闢\n其僭號也臣者天君稱天子為天王諸侯不言天\n公闢王也大夫有臣者稱之曰主不言君闢諸侯\n也此言皆為使民疑惑不知孰者尊也周禮曰主\n友之讎視從父昆弟盍旦夜鳴求旦之鳥也求不\n可得也人猶惡其欲反晝夜而亂晦明況於臣之\n僭君求不可得之類亂上下惑眾也同姓者謂先\n王先公子孫有繼及之道者也其非此則無嫌也\n僕右恆朝服君則各以時事唯在軍同服爾\n疏\n自\n此至犯君一節明章疑別嫌恐尊卑相僭使人疑\n惑之事疑謂是非不決禮以章明之微謂幽隱不\n著禮以分別之楚越書葬則當稱葬某王闢王之\n名故不書葬盍旦欲反夜而為旦猶臣之奢僭欲\n反而為上也此逸詩僕及車右身衣朝服故曲禮\n雲乘路馬必朝服是也其朝服之內則有虎裘狼\n裘故玉藻雲君之右虎裘厥左狼裘是也僖五年\n左傳雲均服振振取虢之","is_preview":true,"preview_page_limit":10}