{"resource_id":5515,"title":"春冰室野乘","format":"md","encoding":"utf-8","chapters":[{"id":"chapter-1","title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","sections":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","title":"目錄","paragraphs":[]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","title":"捲上","paragraphs":["揀魔辨異錄","雍幹遺事（二則）","乾隆宮禁遺事（三則）","乾隆朝萬壽慶典之盛（二則）","宣宗沖齡神武","德宗皇帝聖德恭紀（二則）","德宗外交之大度","曆書異聞","乾隆朝偽皇孫之獄","明太祖御書墨跡","正音書院","福八","明故太子之異聞","交泰殿大鐘（三則）","明太傅遺事","徐健庵遺事","郭華野遺事","高文良公夫人之能詩","鴉片遺聞","田文鏡之幕客","於文襄出缺之異聞","來文端之知人","大臣微行（三則）","和珅供詞","紀和珅遺事（四則）","管韞山侍御之直節","畢太夫人訓子詩","楊重英遺事","尹嘉銓罪案異聞","吳穀人遺事","劉文清姬人善書","龐雪崖之遺愛","金簡","朱文正之迷信","成得大逆案","林清逆案異聞","湯文端遺事","楊忠武公遺事","梁山舟遺事","李申耆遺事","湯海秋之死","慄恭勤公遺事","前輩愛才之篤（二則）","內務府糜費","道光時南河官吏之侈汰","曹杜兩相得諡文正之由","穆相權勢之重","張船山侍御之直節","道光朝兩儒將","林文忠公遺詩"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-3","title":"卷中","paragraphs":["林鄧唱和詩詞 三則","陶文毅識左文襄","桂林寇警軼聞","左文襄軼事","左文襄聯語","左文襄遺議","李文忠公遺事","閻文介遺事","倭文端沮開同文館","恭王用人之公","朱提督洪章遺事","張汶祥案異聞","林夫人書稿","高心夔遺事","延樹南宗伯之大節","薛雲階司寇之法學","寶文靖遺事（二則）","多忠勇公軼事","國朝列女傳三人","李蓮英女弟之指婚","廚役高識","沈副憲之知遇","某太史遺事二則","浙案異聞","鎮平王樹汶之獄","王可莊太守失歡於寶文靖","輓聯","紀馬江死事諸將","甲申越南戰事雜紀","章高元失青島之遺聞","服妖","庚子拳亂軼聞","張樵野侍郎遺翰（三則）","中堂之識字","尚書忠愛","劉博泉侍郎之直","張文襄遺事（二則）"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-4","title":"卷下","paragraphs":["都門詞事匯錄 七則","半塘老人遊仙詞","九九銷寒圖","鷓鴣天詠","詠珍妃殉國事","詠雛伶五九事","紀王煥事","陶農部宮詞","紀歙鮑烈士增祥事","紀大刀王五事","南下窪水怪","百年前海王村之書肆 琉璃廠於遼為海王村","燕郊廢寺之金爐臺","雲南銅廠","嘉禾圖","知不足齋日記鈔本","三進士出身之奇","奏疏紕繆","文牘謬誤","明季兩烈婦","李奉貞","女子絕技","君杏農侍御","陳子莊明府之外交","王文靖遺文","宰白鴨","史撫部詩","黃公度京卿遺詞","周太史（蘭）雋語","題壁詩","孫北海雅謔","巧對","國初富室","官書錯誤","《四庫全書》之濫觴","私家藏書樓","閨中經世遠識","吳梅村身後之文字獄","吳漢槎髫年能詩","大盲頭陀遺詩","孫豹人遺事","吳徵君農祥遺事","屈翁山遺詩","錢牧齋詩案（七則）","香冢鸚鵡冢","夢異","洪大全遺事","石達開之日記","吳三桂之逆跡","戈登遺言","丁韙良被騙","赫承先求應鄉試","黃靖南遺事","詩鐘匯錄（三則）","隱語彙錄","鐵路輸入中國之始","乞食制府","時藝餘譚","術士能代人飲食","馬士英玉佩"]},{"id":"chapter-1-section-5","title":"●捲上","paragraphs":["○揀魔辨異錄","《揀魔辨異錄》一書，世宗憲皇帝御製，以闢天童僧法藏宏忍師徒之邪說者也。簡端列諭旨一道，計四千一百餘言，略謂佛道以指悟自心為本，利人接物，直達心原。外道魔道，亦具有知見，因誤認佛性，謗毀戒行，故謂之魔。朕覽密雲《悟天隱修語錄》，其言句機用，單提向上，直指人心，乃契西來的意，得曹溪正脈。及見密雲之徒法藏所言，全迷本性，無知妄語，不但不知佛法本旨，即其本師悟處，全未窺見。其嗣宏忍，復有《五宗救》一書，造孽無窮。今其魔子魔孫，至於不坐香，不結制，甚至飲酒食肉，毀戒破律，唯以呤詩作文，媚悅士大夫。若不翦除，則諸佛法眼，眾生慧命，所關非細。朕既深悉禪宗之旨，豫識將來魔孽之深，不他屏斥，魔法何時消滅？著將藏內所有藏、忍語錄，並《五宗原》、《五宗救》等書，盡行毀板，僧徒不許私自收藏，有違旨隱匿者，發覺以不敬律論。另將《五宗救》等書，逐條駁正（案即此書）刻入藏內，使後世知其魔異，不起他疑。天童密雲悟派下法藏一支，所有徒眾，著直省督撫，詳細查明，盡削去支派，永不許復入祖庭。果能於他方參學，得正知見，另嗣它宗，方許秉佛。諭到之日，天下祖庭，系法藏子孫開堂者，即撤鍾板，不許說法。地方官即擇天童下別支，承接方丈。朕但斥除魔外，與常住原自無涉，與十方參學人更無涉，地方官勿誤會朕意。凡常住內一草一木，不得動搖，參學之徒，不得驚擾，奉行不善，即以違旨論。如伊門下僧徒，固守魔說，不肯心悅誠服者，著來見朕，朕自以佛法，與之較量。如果見過於朕，所論尤高，朕即收回原旨，仍立三峰宗派。如伎倆已窮，負固不服，以世法哀求者，則朕以世法從重治罪云云。此旨既出，當時督撫，非皆諳習佛法之人，不知如何遵旨辦理。書凡八卷，每條先以小字，低一格錄宏忍原書於前，而以大字頂格，書聖制於後，與駁呂留良《四書講義》體例相同。特彼書為儒臣奉敕編纂，此書則一字一句，悉出聖裁耳（按藏忍之書，既入釋藏，其人必非國朝人，但未知其生當何代，當質諸精通內學者）。","書中第六卷有一條涉及儒書，因辨《史記》記孔子事之不可信，恭錄於此，以見大聖人讀書論世之精識。略雲，《論語》言孔子在陳絕糧，不言陳發卒徒圍孔子也。孟子曰：「孔子之厄於陳蔡之間，無上下之交也。」孟子何為有此言哉？蓋當時即有陳蔡發兵之說，而孟子辨之，謂陳蔡君臣皆與孔子無交，是以適有絕糧之厄，而非有兵戌之患云爾。歷來轉以《史記》釋《孟子》，而《孟子》之意遂不顯。按《史記》所載，吳伐陳，楚救之，軍於城父，知孔子在陳蔡間，使人召之。陳蔡之大夫相謂曰：「孔子賢者，其刺譏皆中侯王之疾，恐至楚而發我陰私。」遂相與發卒徒圍孔子，絕糧三日。孔子使子貢告於楚，昭王發兵迎孔子，圍乃解。此其為子虛烏有無疑。是時陳蔡安敢構怨於楚，且吳伐陳而楚救之，楚迎孔子而陳轉圍之，陳君臣雖至愚劣，安敢當一大國伐我之時，更得罪救我之大國耶？楚使者與孔子俱，陳其並圍之耶，抑解圍一角而出之耶？楚王聞之，有不即發兵迎孔子，而必待子貢之來告耶？從者皆病莫能興，子貢獨能潰圍而出耶？此事之必無者也。且所記孔子告子貢、顏淵曰：「匪兕匪虎，率彼曠野，吾道非耶，何以至此？」子貢曰：「夫子之道大，故天下莫能容，盍少貶焉？」顏淵曰：「不容何病？不容然後見夫子。」夫顏淵、子貢之賢，豈得謬戾至此？君子當患難，省躬克己，則有之矣，安得有忽思改弦易操之理？且道大則於人無所不容，而亦無惡於天下，豈有以道大而轉致天下莫能容之事？如果至不容於天下，則必於己實有不韙，天下國家，豈有皆非之理？安得漫然曰不容何病，不容然後見夫子？豈聖賢戒慎恐懼之心哉？且孔子於子貢之勸以少貶，則怒而嗤之；於顏淵之言不容何病，則悅而受之。天下有"]}]}],"toc":[{"id":"chapter-1-section-1","chapter_title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","section_title":"目錄","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-2","chapter_title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","section_title":"捲上","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-3","chapter_title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","section_title":"卷中","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-4","chapter_title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","section_title":"卷下","is_available":true},{"id":"chapter-1-section-5","chapter_title":"春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著","section_title":"●捲上","is_available":true}],"plain_text":"# 春冰室野乘　　（清）李嶽瑞 著\n## 目錄\n## 捲上\n揀魔辨異錄\n雍幹遺事（二則）\n乾隆宮禁遺事（三則）\n乾隆朝萬壽慶典之盛（二則）\n宣宗沖齡神武\n德宗皇帝聖德恭紀（二則）\n德宗外交之大度\n曆書異聞\n乾隆朝偽皇孫之獄\n明太祖御書墨跡\n正音書院\n福八\n明故太子之異聞\n交泰殿大鐘（三則）\n明太傅遺事\n徐健庵遺事\n郭華野遺事\n高文良公夫人之能詩\n鴉片遺聞\n田文鏡之幕客\n於文襄出缺之異聞\n來文端之知人\n大臣微行（三則）\n和珅供詞\n紀和珅遺事（四則）\n管韞山侍御之直節\n畢太夫人訓子詩\n楊重英遺事\n尹嘉銓罪案異聞\n吳穀人遺事\n劉文清姬人善書\n龐雪崖之遺愛\n金簡\n朱文正之迷信\n成得大逆案\n林清逆案異聞\n湯文端遺事\n楊忠武公遺事\n梁山舟遺事\n李申耆遺事\n湯海秋之死\n慄恭勤公遺事\n前輩愛才之篤（二則）\n內務府糜費\n道光時南河官吏之侈汰\n曹杜兩相得諡文正之由\n穆相權勢之重\n張船山侍御之直節\n道光朝兩儒將\n林文忠公遺詩\n## 卷中\n林鄧唱和詩詞 三則\n陶文毅識左文襄\n桂林寇警軼聞\n左文襄軼事\n左文襄聯語\n左文襄遺議\n李文忠公遺事\n閻文介遺事\n倭文端沮開同文館\n恭王用人之公\n朱提督洪章遺事\n張汶祥案異聞\n林夫人書稿\n高心夔遺事\n延樹南宗伯之大節\n薛雲階司寇之法學\n寶文靖遺事（二則）\n多忠勇公軼事\n國朝列女傳三人\n李蓮英女弟之指婚\n廚役高識\n沈副憲之知遇\n某太史遺事二則\n浙案異聞\n鎮平王樹汶之獄\n王可莊太守失歡於寶文靖\n輓聯\n紀馬江死事諸將\n甲申越南戰事雜紀\n章高元失青島之遺聞\n服妖\n庚子拳亂軼聞\n張樵野侍郎遺翰（三則）\n中堂之識字\n尚書忠愛\n劉博泉侍郎之直\n張文襄遺事（二則）\n## 卷下\n都門詞事匯錄 七則\n半塘老人遊仙詞\n九九銷寒圖\n鷓鴣天詠\n詠珍妃殉國事\n詠雛伶五九事\n紀王煥事\n陶農部宮詞\n紀歙鮑烈士增祥事\n紀大刀王五事\n南下窪水怪\n百年前海王村之書肆 琉璃廠於遼為海王村\n燕郊廢寺之金爐臺\n雲南銅廠\n嘉禾圖\n知不足齋日記鈔本\n三進士出身之奇\n奏疏紕繆\n文牘謬誤\n明季兩烈婦\n李奉貞\n女子絕技\n君杏農侍御\n陳子莊明府之外交\n王文靖遺文\n宰白鴨\n史撫部詩\n黃公度京卿遺詞\n周太史（蘭）雋語\n題壁詩\n孫北海雅謔\n巧對\n國初富室\n官書錯誤\n《四庫全書》之濫觴\n私家藏書樓\n閨中經世遠識\n吳梅村身後之文字獄\n吳漢槎髫年能詩\n大盲頭陀遺詩\n孫豹人遺事\n吳徵君農祥遺事\n屈翁山遺詩\n錢牧齋詩案（七則）\n香冢鸚鵡冢\n夢異\n洪大全遺事\n石達開之日記\n吳三桂之逆跡\n戈登遺言\n丁韙良被騙\n赫承先求應鄉試\n黃靖南遺事\n詩鐘匯錄（三則）\n隱語彙錄\n鐵路輸入中國之始\n乞食制府\n時藝餘譚\n術士能代人飲食\n馬士英玉佩\n## ●捲上\n○揀魔辨異錄\n《揀魔辨異錄》一書，世宗憲皇帝御製，以闢天童僧法藏宏忍師徒之邪說者也。簡端列諭旨一道，計四千一百餘言，略謂佛道以指悟自心為本，利人接物，直達心原。外道魔道，亦具有知見，因誤認佛性，謗毀戒行，故謂之魔。朕覽密雲《悟天隱修語錄》，其言句機用，單提向上，直指人心，乃契西來的意，得曹溪正脈。及見密雲之徒法藏所言，全迷本性，無知妄語，不但不知佛法本旨，即其本師悟處，全未窺見。其嗣宏忍，復有《五宗救》一書，造孽無窮。今其魔子魔孫，至於不坐香，不結制，甚至飲酒食肉，毀戒破律，唯以呤詩作文，媚悅士大夫。若不翦除，則諸佛法眼，眾生慧命，所關非細。朕既深悉禪宗之旨，豫識將來魔孽之深，不他屏斥，魔法何時消滅？著將藏內所有藏、忍語錄，並《五宗原》、《五宗救》等書，盡行毀板，僧徒不許私自收藏，有違旨隱匿者，發覺以不敬律論。另將《五宗救》等書，逐條駁正（案即此書）刻入藏內，使後世知其魔異，不起他疑。天童密雲悟派下法藏一支，所有徒眾，著直省督撫，詳細查明，盡削去支派，永不許復入祖庭。果能於他方參學，得正知見，另嗣它宗，方許秉佛。諭到之日，天下祖庭，系法藏子孫開堂者，即撤鍾板，不許說法。地方官即擇天童下別支，承接方丈。朕但斥除魔外，與常住原自無涉，與十方參學人更無涉，地方官勿誤會朕意。凡常住內一草一木，不得動搖，參學之徒，不得驚擾，奉行不善，即以違旨論。如伊門下僧徒，固守魔說，不肯心悅誠服者，著來見朕，朕自以佛法，與之較量。如果見過於朕，所論尤高，朕即收回原旨，仍立三峰宗派。如伎倆已窮，負固不服，以世法哀求者，則朕以世法從重治罪云云。此旨既出，當時督撫，非皆諳習佛法之人，不知如何遵旨辦理。書凡八卷，每條先以小字，低一格錄宏忍原書於前，而以大字頂格，書聖制於後，與駁呂留良《四書講義》體例相同。特彼書為儒臣奉敕編纂，此書則一字一句，悉出聖裁耳（按藏忍之書，既入釋藏，其人必非國朝人，但未知其生當何代，當質諸精通內學者）。\n書中第六卷有一條涉及儒書，因辨《史記》記孔子事之不可信，恭錄於此，以見大聖人讀書論世之精識。略雲，《論語》言孔子在陳絕糧，不言陳發卒徒圍孔子也。孟子曰：「孔子之厄於陳蔡之間，無上下之交也。」孟子何為有此言哉？蓋當時即有陳蔡發兵之說，而孟子辨之，謂陳蔡君臣皆與孔子無交，是以適有絕糧之厄，而非有兵戌之患云爾。歷來轉以《史記》釋《孟子》，而《孟子》之意遂不顯。按《史記》所載，吳伐陳，楚救之，軍於城父，知孔子在陳蔡間，使人召之。陳蔡之大夫相謂曰：「孔子賢者，其刺譏皆中侯王之疾，恐至楚而發我陰私。」遂相與發卒徒圍孔子，絕糧三日。孔子使子貢告於楚，昭王發兵迎孔子，圍乃解。此其為子虛烏有無疑。是時陳蔡安敢構怨於楚，且吳伐陳而楚救之，楚迎孔子而陳轉圍之，陳君臣雖至愚劣，安敢當一大國伐我之時，更得罪救我之大國耶？楚使者與孔子俱，陳其並圍之耶，抑解圍一角而出之耶？楚王聞之，有不即發兵迎孔子，而必待子貢之來告耶？從者皆病莫能興，子貢獨能潰圍而出耶？此事之必無者也。且所記孔子告子貢、顏淵曰：「匪兕匪虎，率彼曠野，吾道非耶，何以至此？」子貢曰：「夫子之道大，故天下莫能容，盍少貶焉？」顏淵曰：「不容何病？不容然後見夫子。」夫顏淵、子貢之賢，豈得謬戾至此？君子當患難，省躬克己，則有之矣，安得有忽思改弦易操之理？且道大則於人無所不容，而亦無惡於天下，豈有以道大而轉致天下莫能容之事？如果至不容於天下，則必於己實有不韙，天下國家，豈有皆非之理？安得漫然曰不容何病，不容然後見夫子？豈聖賢戒慎恐懼之心哉？且孔子於子貢之勸以少貶，則怒而嗤之；於顏淵之言不容何病，則悅而受之。天下有","is_preview":true,"preview_page_limit":10}